HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US March 11, 2010
Accountant
             
 
Selecting an accountant attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Accountant Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

The Complaint Charges Its Former Officers In Violating The Antifraud Provisions Of The Securities Laws

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an executive who worked for a customer of Legato Systems, Inc. with aiding and abetting Legato's financial accounting fraud. Named in the Commission's complaint was Vincent Steckler, a former vice president of sales at Logicon, Inc., now Northrop Grumman Information Technology, a division of Northrop Grumman, Inc. According to the complaint, Steckler, 43, of Great Falls, Va., helped former Legato sales executives improperly record revenue on a sale to Logicon when Logicon was not committed to pay for the product. Recording this revenue caused Legato to overstate its 1999 third quarter operating income by 146%. The Commission previously charged Legato, its former chief financial officer and two former Legato sales executives in connection with the company's restatement of its financial results for the last three quarters of 1999.

Helane L. Morrison, District Administrator for the Commission's San Francisco District Office, said, "Sales executives who book phony deals often rely on assistance from people who work for their customers. Today's action highlights the Commission's resolve to hold such persons responsible when they knowingly assist in fraudulent revenue recognition practices."

The Commission's complaint alleges that Steckler assisted two former Legato sales executives in drafting a side letter in connection with an order by Logicon to purchase Legato software for resale to the U.S. Air Force. The side letter granted Logicon the right to cancel the transaction, and noted that the cancellation provision could not appear on the face of Logicon's purchase order "because of the impact on revenue recognition." Unaware of the side letter and the cancellation provision, Legato's finance department caused the company to recognize revenue on the order. As a result of this transaction, Legato's original Form 10-Q for the Sept., 30, 1999, quarter improperly overstated the company's net income by approximately $2 million (146%). Legato later restated this income, and the transaction was ultimately cancelled following the discovery of the side letter.

The complaint charges that Steckler aided and abetted Legato and certain of its former officers in violating the antifraud provisions of the securities laws, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; provisions prohibiting the circumvention of Legato's internal accounting controls and falsification of its records, Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13b2-1thereunder; and provisions requiring the company to provide accurate periodic reports and make and keep accurate books and records Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20 and 13a-13 thereunder. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction against future violations by Steckler, as well as monetary penalties.

In May 2002, the Commission sued Legato's former executive vice president of worldwide sales, David Malmstedt, and its former vice president of sales for North America, Mark Huetteman, for securities fraud for their roles in causing Legato to overstate its financial results for fiscal 1999. At the same time, Legato and its former chief financial officer, Steven Wise, consented to the issuance of a Commission order directing that they cease and desist from violations of the books and records, internal controls and periodic reporting provisions of the federal securities laws.

 


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  • Liability on accounts
  • Truth in Lending Act
  • Fair Credit Billing Act
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • Open-end credit
  • Residual value
  • Cosigner
  • Creditor
  Did You Know?
 
Setting check limits greatly reduces the risk of accounting fraud.

As a business owner you can inform your bank that you would not like to have any checks cashed made out to an individual. The exception should be your payroll checks, which are to be written froma special account and only to designated individuals. Keep your checks in a secure place in order to protect your company from check fraud.

 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Accounting Scam.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.